...company appointed an attorney and entered into an agreement in conformity to the statute. Held, 1. That the Constitution of the United States secures to citizens of another State, than that in which suit ls brought, an absolute right to remove their cases into the Federal Court upon compliance with the...

...able to discover In this case any countenance for the statute of Wisconsin which we are considering. On this branch of the case the conclusion Is this...upon compliance with the terms of the act of 1789. 2d. The statute of Wisconsin Is an obstruction to this right. Is repugnant to the Constitution of the...

...able to discover in this case any countenance for the statute of Wisconsin which we are considering. On this branch of the case, the conclusion is this...upon compliance with the terms of the act of 1789. 2d. The statute of Wisconsin is an obstruction to this right, is repugnant to the Constitution of the...

...cause remanded for further proceedings, IN CONFORMITY WITH THIS OPINION. INSURANCE COMPANY v. MORSE. 1. The Constitution of the United States secures to citizens...of another State than that in which suit is brought nn absolute right to remove their cases into the Federal court, upon compliance with the terms of the...

...corporation. Hone v. Treasurer of Plaiafield, 251. 26. The Constitution of the United States secures to the citizens of another state than that in which suit is brought, an absolute right to remove them into the Federal court. Insurance Co. v. Morse, 316. 27. The obstruction of this right by n statute...

...this branch of the cose the conclusion la tbii: "1st. The constitution of the United States lecure» to citizens of another State than that in which suit...upon compliance with the terms of the act of 1789. •••-.'. I . The statute of Wisconsin is an obstruction to this right, is repugnant to the constitution...

...Company v. Jforte, 20 Wall. 445. The view adopted by the Supreme Court embraces these points : 1. That " the Constitution of the United States secures to citizens of another State other than that in which the suit is brought an absolute right to remove their cases into the Federal...

...Company v. Aforne, 20 Wall. 445. The view adopted by the Supreme Court embraces these points : 1. That " the Constitution of the United States secures to citizens of another State other than that in which the suit is brought an absolute right to remove their cases into the Federal...

...Co. v. Morse, 20 Wallace, 445, this point was very fully dismissed, and it was there held, tbat as the Constitution of the United States secures to citizens...absolute right to remove their cases into the federal courts, upon compliance with the terms Qf the judiciary act, neither a statute of the State nor an...

...to citizens of another ,State, when sued by a citizen of a State in which the suit is brought, the absolute right to remove their cases into the Federal...court upon compliance with the terms of the act of Congress enacted to effect that purpose. This principle was announced in terms in Insurance Company...