 | 1926 - 1144 pages
...But the court held that "neither state courts nor Legislatures, by giving a tax a particular name, or by the use of some form of words, can take away our duty to consider its real nature and effect." The court held the clear purpose of the act is to reach all sales and secure... | |
 | Railroad Commission of Kentucky - 1910 - 576 pages
...court, said: Neither the State courts nor the Legislatures, by giving the 'tax a particular name or by the use of some form of words, can take away our...duty to consider its nature and effect. If it bears among commerce among the States so directly as to amount to a regulation in a relatively immediate... | |
 | 1921 - 1166 pages
...best it can. Neither the state courts nor the legislatures, by giving the tax a particular name or by the use of some form of words, can take away our...immediate way, it will not be saved by name or form. (Stockard v. Morgan, 185 US 27, 37; Asbell v. Kansas, 209 US 251, 254, 256.)" That the Texas Case Just... | |
 | Oregon. Supreme Court, William Wallace Thayer, Joseph Gardner Wilson, Thomas Benton Odeneal, Julius Augustus Stratton, William Henry Holmes, Reuben S. Strahan, George Henry Burnett, Robert Graves Morrow, James W. Crawford, Frank A. Turner, Bellinger, Charles Byron - 1916 - 806 pages
...ftep. 638): "Neither the state courts nor the legislatures, by giving the tax a particular name, or by the use of some form of words, can take away our duty to consider its nature and effect." True, it is that, if the city chose to do so, it could grant a permit to a person or corporation to... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1908 - 664 pages
...best it can. Neither the state courts nor the legislatures, by giving the tax a particular name or by the use of some form of words, can take away our...immediate way, it will not be saved by name or form. Stockard v. Morgan, 185 US 27, 37; Asbell v. Kansas, 209 US 251, 254, 256. We are of opinion that the... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1910 - 738 pages
...court said: " Neither the state courts nor the legislatures, by giving the tax a particular name or by the use of some form of words, can take away our...immediate way, it will not be saved by name or form. Stockard v. Morgan, 185 US 27, 37;Asbell v. Kansas, 209 US 251, 254, 256. 216 US Opinion of the Court.... | |
 | 1910 - 740 pages
...court said: "Neither the state courts nor the legislatures, by giving the tax a particular name or by the use of some form of words, can take away our...immediate way, it will not be saved by name or form. Stockard v. Morgan, 185 US 27, 37, 48 L. ed. 785, 794, 22 Sup. Ct. Rep. 576; Asbell v. Kansas, 209... | |
 | Westel Woodbury Willoughby - 1910 - 804 pages
...can. Neither the state courts nor the legislatures, by giving the tax a particular name or by the life of some form of words, can take away our duty to consider...immediate way, it will not be saved by name or form." As regards the tax in question, the court say: "We are of opinion that the statute levying this tax... | |
 | Slason Thompson - 1911 - 512 pages
...void, it said : Neither the state courts, nor the Legislatures, by giving the tax a particular name, or by the use of some form of words, can take away our...immediate way, it will not be saved by name or form. "Only last year in the Kansas cases (216 US 1, 56) the Supreme Court again repiidiated this contention.... | |
 | Illinois. General Assembly. House of Representatives - 1911 - 1710 pages
...beat it can.. Neither the State courts nor the legislatures, by giving the tax a particular name or by the use of some form of words, can take away our...effect. If It bears upon commerce among the States directly as to amount to a regulation in a relatively immediate way, it will not be saved by name or... | |
| |
Neither the state courts nor the legislatures, by giving the tax a particular name or by the use of some form of words, can take away our duty to consider its nature and effect. 
