 | Thomas Beven - 1908 - 938 pages
...intervened of itself sufficient to stand as the cause of the misfortune, the other must be considered as too remote. In the present case we think there is'...cotton. The fact that it was carried to the cotton by fire burning another building supplies no new force or power which caused the burning. Nor can the... | |
 | Thomas Beven - 1908 - 960 pages
...intervened of itself sufficient to stand as the cause of the misfortune, the other must be considered as too remote. In the present case we think there is no such new caxise. The explosion undoubtedly produced or set in operation the fire which burned the plaintiff's... | |
 | 1909 - 1278 pages
...across I the street. The court said: "The explosion undoubtedly produced or set in operation the lire which burned the plaintiff's cotton. The fact that it was carried to the cotton by lirst burning another building supplies no new force or power which caused ! the burning. Nor can the... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1912 - 1054 pages
...Statute of Mar. 3, 1865. and the general rule. Where an explosion produced or set In operation the flre which burned the plaintiff's cotton, the fact that...was carried to the cotton by first burnIng another building, will not so take the case out of the exception In a policy, that the Insurers will not be... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1912 - 1054 pages
...cause. The explosion undoubtedly pro duced or set in operation the fire which burned the plaintiffs cotton. The fact that it was carried to the cotton by first burning another building, supplies no new force or power which caused the burning. Nor can the accidental circumstance... | |
 | Charles Albert Keigwin - 1915 - 584 pages
...is no such new cause. The exp'osion undoubtedly produced or set in operation the (ire which turned the plaintiff's cotton. The fact, that it was carried to the cotton by first burning another building, supplies no new force or power which caused the burning. Nor can the accidental circumstance,... | |
 | Charles Albert Keigwin - 1915 - 604 pages
...intervened, of itself sutfcient to stand as the cause of the misfortune, the other must lie considered as too remote. In the present case we think there Is no such new cause. The exp'osion undoubtedly produced or set in operation the fire which burned the plaintiff's cotton. The... | |
 | Charles Albert Keigwin - 1920 - 562 pages
...intervened, of itself sufficient to stand as the cause of the misfortune, the other must be considered as too remote. In the present case we think there is...was carried to the cotton by first burning another building, supplies no new force or power which caused the burning. Nor can the accidental circumstance,... | |
 | 1924 - 792 pages
...intervened of itself sufficient to stand as the cause of the misfortune, the other must be considered as too remote. In the present case we think there is no such new cause." These dicta related to the construction of a clause in a contract of insurance, not to causal relation... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1926 - 1192 pages
...intervened of itself sufficient to stand as the cause of the misfortune, the other must be considered as too remote. In the present case we think there is...was carried to the cotton by first burning another building supplies no new force or power which caused the burning. Nor can the accidental circumstance... | |
| |
The explosion undoubtedly produced or set in operation the fire which burned the plaintiff's cotton. The fact that it was carried to the cotton by first burning another building supplies no new force or power which caused the burning. 
